The minnesota manual dexterity test as a bimanual performance measure in people with multiple sclerosis

Ovacik U., TARAKCI E., GÜNGÖR F., Menengic K. N., Leblebici G., Acar Z. O., ...Daha Fazla

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, cilt.64, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 64
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103943
  • Dergi Adı: MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Multiple sclerosis, Minnesota manual dexterity test, Upper extremity, Manual dexterity, Outcome assessment, UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION, FATIGUE SEVERITY SCALE, PEG TEST, VALIDATION, ABILITY
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: Increasing knowledge about unilateral or bilateral upper limb (UL) involvement in multiple sclerosis (MS) has revealed the need for an objective assessment tool. Objective: The aims of our study were to evaluate manual dexterity using Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (MMDT) in people with MS (pwMS), to investigate the validity and feasibility of MMDT, and to examine its relationship with other variables. Methods: Eighty pwMS and forty healthy controls were enrolled. Demographic and clinical characteristics of pwMS were recorded, and manual dexterity, activity performance of the UL, hand grip and pinch strength, and fatigue levels were evaluated. Validity was performed using the Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT). Feasibility was evaluated with questions directed to pwMS. The relationship between MMDT and strength, ABILHAND, fatigue, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and disease duration was examined and multiple regression analysis was established. Results: For the MMDT of pwMS were mean placing-dominant 82.73 s, mean placing-nondominant 88.6 s, and mean two-hand turning and placing 61.75 s. All results were statistically significantly different compared to healthy controls. There was moderate to high correlation between the subtests of the MMDT and the NHPT. 85-90% positive feedback was received for the feasibility of MMDT. A significant interaction was found between all subtests of MMDT and EDSS, ABILHAND and disease duration in predicting manual dexterity scores. Conclusions: MMDT is a valid and feasible tool for assessing manual dexterity and it can be used as an appropriate outcome measure in researches aiming to evaluate bilateral UL function in pwMS.