Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
NEUROCHIRURGIE, cilt.69, sa.1, 2023 (SCI-Expanded)
Introduction. - This study aims to find out if there is any relationship between disc pathology and spinopelvic morphology, respectively. Methods. - A total of 152 patients who complained about low back pain were assessed retrospectively. Patients were divided into three groups based on the presence of disc pathology: non-degenerative (ND) (n = 34), degenerative disc disease (DDD) (n = 80), and lumbar disc herniation (LDH) (n = 38). Spinopelvic parameters were measured on the lateral standing radiographs using Surgimap (R) Software. The degree of degeneration of each disc was evaluated using T2-weighted images according to the Pfirmann classi-fication. Correlation analyses were performed.Results. - No significant difference was observed between the three groups in terms of sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters. Age and BMI were positively correlated with DDD and LDH. PI and proximal lombar lordosis (PLL) were the only effective variables in predicting DDD. PT and distal lumbar lordosis (DLL) were found to be effective variables in predicting LDH. PI and PT values in patients with L1, L2, and L3 DDD were statistically significantly higher than those without degeneration (P < 0.05). Although there were no statistical differences between PI and PT values (P > 0.05), DLL values in L4 and L5 DDD patients were significantly lower than those without degeneration (P = 0.041; P = 0.046; P < 0.05).Conclusions. - The sagittal morphology of the spine directly influences the extent of lumbar disc degen-eration. As the values of PI and PT increase, disc degeneration tends to occur at higher levels (L1-2-3). Disc degeneration at lower levels (L4-5) was associated with low DLL levels. Level of evidence. - Level III, retrospective study.(c) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.